The answer is (4, -6), or the fourth option.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
25%
Step-by-step explanation:
Apparently, we're to assume that anything not spent is saved.
Let Hideo's income be 1. Then Akira's income is 5/8. Akira's expenses are 60% = 3/5 of that value, so ...
Akira's expenses = (3/5)(5/8) = 3/8 . . . . . of Hideo's income
Hideo's expenses are twice this amount, so ...
Hideo's expenses = (2)(3/8) = 3/4 . . . . . of Hideo's income
That means Hideo saves 1 -3/4 = 1/4 = 25/100 = 25% of his income.
Hideo saves 25% of his income.
Because for example 349+567 is something you need to regroup.You start by the ones.9+7=16. You don't always need to regroup though
Let p be: John goes to the beach
Let q be: He will go surfing.
Then in symbolic form, the argument becomes:

p ⇒ q
p
---------------------
∴ q
An argument is valid if the conjuction of the premises implies the conclusion.
p | q | p ⇒ q | (p ⇒ q) ∧ p | [(p ⇒ q) ∧ p] ⇒ q
---------------------------------------------------------------------\
F | F | T | F | T
F | T | T | F | T
T | F | F | F | T
T | T | T | T | T
The table above shows that the argument is a tautology.
Hence, the argument is valid