Answer:
The correct answer is 5%.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
We can calculate the growth rate by using following formula:
Growth rate = (Dividend of 3rd year ÷ Dividend of 1st year)^1/2 -1
By putting the value in the formula, we get
Growth rate = ($4.41 ÷ $4 )^1/2 - 1
= ( $0.41)^1/2 -1
= 0.05 or 5%
Answer:
These statements are correct:
- It makes it easier to compare prices across Europe - the Euro is the common curriency across 19 countries, but prices in those countries are far from being the same. For example, Germany is a lot more expensive than Greece (although a lot wealthier too), and Greek people can easily find out that the same product in Germany costs more euros than in Greece.
- It makes Europe an optimal currency area - in the Eurozone, economic efficiency is now higher because resources can be allocated across different countries thanks to the fact that prices can be compared in the region.
Answer:
actual quantity of the cost-allocation base used and the budgeted quantity of the cost-allocation base that should have been used to produce the actual output
Explanation:
The formula to calculate the variable overhead efficiency variance is shown below:
= (Standard quantity - actual quantity) ÷ budgeted variable overhead cost per unit
In the case when the standard quantity is more than the actual one so it is favorable else unfavorable
Therefore the last option is correct
And, the other options are wrong
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: Diseconomies of scales.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept known as <em>''diseconomies of scales''</em>, in the field of economics and management, refers to the situation where an organization finds itself in problems due to the fact that a large production is being produced by them and the coordination and management of that large production is beginning to cause trouble and that impacts in the fact that the company will produce good or services with an increase in the cost per unit of the products.
Answer:
If the effective tax rate increases then the net savings coming from investments will get lowered as a result the investment will have higher payback period (The increase in effective tax rate would lower demand of the product which means there is decline in net saving arising from the sale of the product). Likewise this decrease in annual net savings will also decrease the internal rate of return which shows that their are increased chances of project rejections. The NPV method is based on cash flows and relevant costing just like IRR and payback method but the only difference is that it assumes that the cash earned would be reinvested at cost of capital. The NPV will also decrease due to increased effective tax rate.
