The answer to your question would be:
They wanted a strong central government.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
C, no because he was trespassing
Explanation:
The teenager was trespassing on somebody else's property and his action will not prevail in court. The general rule is : if somebody is trespassing on your property, you are not responsible for any injury occurring there.
<em>Dog owners must prove that the victim of the attack was illegally on the property to avoid liability.</em>
A 'Beware of the dog' sign does not remove liability from the dog's owner, it is only a warning.
The teenager was trespassing and the landowner is therefor not liable for his injuries.
C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources would be the best option, because these sources differ from primary sources in that they are not first-hand accounts.
