Answer:
the atoms in cyclohexanone are not in the same
Explanation:
but they are in a benzene ring! Cyclohexane has only sigma bonded carbons with bonds that stick out of the plane
The first dissociation for H2X:
H2X +H2O ↔ HX + H3O
initial 0.15 0 0
change -X +X +X
at equlibrium 0.15-X X X
because Ka1 is small we can assume neglect x in H2X concentration
Ka1 = [HX][H3O]/[H2X]
4.5x10^-6 =( X )(X) / (0.15)
X = √(4.5x10^-6*0.15)
∴X = 8.2 x 10-4 m
∴[HX] & [H3O] = 8.2x10^-4
the second dissociation of H2X
HX + H2O↔ X^2 + H3O
8.2x10^-4 Y 8.2x10^-4
Ka2 for Hx = 1.2x10^-11
Ka2 = [X2][H3O]/[HX]
1.2x10^-11= y (8.2x10^-4)*(8.2x10^-4)
∴y = 1.78x10^-5
∴[X^2] = 1.78x10^-5 m
Answer: Thus 0.724 mol of 
are needed to obtain 18.6 g of 
Explanation:
To calculate the moles :
According to stoichiometry :
2 moles of are produced by = 1 mole of
Thus 1.09 moles of will be produced by =
of
But as yield of reaction is 75.6 %, the amount of needed is =
Thus 0.724 mol of are needed to obtain 18.6 g of
Answer:
Incomplete
Explanation:
I wouldn't say that a scientific theory is wrong.
It is the best we have at the time, based on all available knowledge .
As each new discovery is made, scientists modify the theory to fit the new knowledge.
The scientific method is a never-ending process.
i mean technically, no. only because water is water and water makes things wet. you know? unless you pour water onto water then idk honestly, truly...
