There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)
Explanation:
In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.
The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.
Answer:
If we were elected by the people, their arguments and opinions could influence decisions. Therefore, by being appointed by the president, judges can remain unbiased and completely fair, which will produce the best outcomes in the court of law.
Explanation:
Answer:
What might be unfair is if the person is trying to say there side but the cop is not listening to the persons reason for why they did it
Explanation:
for my explanation is to just worry about you and if the cops try to say any smart comment don't say anything because all ur gonna do is put yourself in a big hole of trouble
Answer:
The second type of encounter occurs when an officer believes there may be some sort of suspicious activity occurring which may justify police involvement.
Explanation:
B police officer I believe not sure
