What is 600.00 lb into g?

Write 11 times 47 using the distributive property. Then simplify.

Simora [160]

Distributive property is in the form of:

a (b+c) = ab + bc

In this case, we try writing 47 as:

47 = 50-3 or 47 = 40+7

Therefore:

11 x 47 = 11 x (50-3) = 11 x 50 - 11 x 3 = 550 - 33 = 517

or

11 x 47 = 11 x (40+7) = 11 x 40 + 11 x 7 = 440 + 77 = 517

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Convert the angle 260° to radians. Express your answer exactly

elena-s [515]

Answer:

Here there is a picture attached on how to convert radians

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

A triangle with the coordinates (6,4), (2,-1), and (-3,5) is translated 4 Units left and rotate 180 degrees about the origin. Wh

ankoles [38]

Answer:

(-2,-4),(2,1), and (7,-5)

Step-by-step explanation:

The given triangle has coordinates (6,4), (2,-1), and (-3,5).

When we translate 4 units left, the we obtain:

(6,4)------>(6-4,4)=(2,4)

(2,-1)----->(2-4,-1)=(-2,-1)

(-3,5)----->(-3-4,5)=(-7,5)

When the resulting figure is rotated 180° about the origin, the coordinates of the final figure becomes

(2,4)------>(-2,-4)

(-2,-1)----->(2,1)

(-7,5)------->(7,-5)

NB: The mapping for 180° rotation is:

(x,y)----->(-x,-y)

8 0

3 years ago

You don't need to construct a Venn Diagram, it is just part of the instruction. Just determine whether or not the argument is va

icang [17]

Answer:

It is valid.

Venn Diagram is attached.

I also provided a truth table.

I also provided a couple of names this argument could be called.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this question.

Thank you kindly.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a person is a poet, then that person is a loner.

If a person is a loner, then that person is a taxi driver.

If a person is a poet, then that person is a taxi drive.

This is in the form:

p->q

q->r

Therefore, p->r.

This is an example of a hypothetical syllogism.

The first thing my mind goes to when seeing this is the transitive property which says if A is related to B and B is related to C then A is related to C.

So this syllogism also has another name and it is called the principle of transitivity of implication.

Let p=person is a poet, q=person is a loner, and r=person is a taxi driver.

I'm going to make a truth table and compare the truth values of the propositions to the conclusion.

Since we have 3 variables, we are going to need 2^3=8 rows.

p q r p->q q->r (p->q) and (q->r) conclusion=(p->r)

T T T T T T T

T T F T F F F

T F T F T F T

T F F F T F F

F F F T T T T

F F T T T T T

F T F T F F T

F T T T T T T

So we are trying to see if we ever have the preposition part true and the conclusion false.

That doesn't happen so the argument is valid.

5 0

3 years ago

Can someone explain this? :)

Alchen [17]

I'll do part (a) to get you started.

The angle 'a' pairs up with the 123 degree angle as a corresponding angle pair. Due to the parallel lines, the corresponding angles are congruent. Therefore a = 123.

We also see that b = 123 as well since a = b (they are vertical angles).

Notice how angle c is adjacent to the 123 degree angle. These two angles form a straight line, so they must add to 180 degrees.

c+123 = 180

c = 180-123

c = 57

-------------------------

To summarize, we have these three angles

a = 123

b = 123

c = 57

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers