Answer:
3x
Step-by-step explanation:
Do recall that squaring and the *radical sign* cancel each other out... like so:(
)
= a
When you put it that way, it isn't enough :P
(
)
= a
(
)
=?
so you start with
(
)
=
8x+1=25 <-- subtract 1 to both sides
8x=24 <- divide 8 to both sides
x= 3
To find out if it's an extraneous solution ask yourself: It mustn't result in a radical that I like to call... 'illegal'. Plug it into the radicand 8x+1 and make sure you get something that is not a negative number.... so, DO you get a negative number when you plug in x = 3 into the radicand?
(extraneous solution is a invalid solution)
x=3 not extraneous
6.5 - 3 = 3.5
11 - 6.5 = 4.5
16.5 - 11 = 5.5
23 - 16.5 = 6.5
From this, you can see that the number being added is increasing by 1 each time.
Therefore, the pattern is adding 3.5, then 4.5, then 5.5, then 6.5, and so on.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
how the prices at Payless compared to the prices
at Famous Footwear. At each store, they randomly
selected 30 pairs of shoes and recorded the price of
each pair. The table shows summary statistics for
the two samples of shoes.28
Store
Mean
SD
Famous Footwear
$45.66
$16.54
Payless
$21.39 $7.47
Do these data provide convincing evidence at the
0.05 significance level that shoes cost less
, on
average, at Payless than at Famous Footwear?
a =
Answer: I think its 2.09
Step-by-step explanation:
But i'm not sure.