Answer:
Critics of the <u>social congnitive </u> personality theory is very sensitive to an individual's interactions with particular situations, but that it gives too little attention to the person's enduring traits.
Explanation:
Social congnitive theory focusses on behavioral modification, for this they study the congnitive and social factors influencing behaviors. Since the objective is to modify conducts, they care to determine how to influence it in order for it to have a change.
The theory says, personality is determined but cognitive processes by which a person decides and acts upon but mostly refering it to social references. This way the arguments says, the theory lacks on the enduring traits of personality, the aspects by which modifications cannot be easily made.
Answer:
correlational research
Explanation:
In correlational research, there will be two variables, that are used to answer a question or clarify a given issue.
When two variables are related, like time spent studying and the grades achieved by students a psychologist research seeks to analyze the relationships that stem from changes in a variable that impact directly the other:
Lets assume that the higher the time the students they spent reviewing the better the goals they get: in this case, there is a direct relationship.
If for example, we study that the higher time they spent studying the less time they have to work, then we are talking also about an indirect relationship.
Answer:
He will not perform well due to increased arousal.
Explanation:
Answer:
The caregivers involved in the error
Explanation:
.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
