The answer is the 3rd choice They want to get one of their memebers elected to a Government office
<span>The Mexican metallogenetic provinces map shows a wide variety of minerals (Fig.3) which include among others: gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead, molybdenum, manganese, fluorite, titanium, coal salt, sulfur and iron.</span>
Answer: did u get an answer for that cuz if u did can u slide
Explanation:
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
A norm in another words mean standard that is generally accepted. While conformity, comes from the word conform. I.e to agree with a standard.
Relating to the above scenario, Sarah has a leader of a group, people agree with what she says unlike bill . In this case, people conform with Sarah as she is a leader ,it is a general norm to follow what a leader says or proposes.
