Answer:
v=169
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide by 4.
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
1) a- rectangle
b- same place you started, facing west
2) a- right triangle
b- parallelogram
c- not sure the specific name they are looking for...
* also have no clue what a recipe is in terms of this lol
3) a- square
b- rectangle, depending on the length of the segments and their distance
apart
4) not sure
<span>If m = 7x + 7, m = 4y, and m = 112
since m = 112
112 = 7x + 7
112 - 7 = 7x
105= 7x
x = 15
112 = 4y
y = 28</span>
