Answer:
Poetry
Explanation:
In literature, poetry is defined as the written expression of thoughts and ideas that possesses a rhythmic quality. It is a form of free expression that allows an author - poet - to describe a situation, thought, or narrate a story in a dramatic and a very emotional, sometimes romantic, manner.
There are three main types of poetry: <em>dramatic, lyrical, </em>and <em>narrative</em>. A poem differs from a story due to the presence of rhymes and meters which make this literary device so unique.
Answer: i have no idaea so thx for the 33 things
Explanation:
The answer is, she most likely to live with her eldest son. In addition to late adulthood, According to socioemotional selectivity theory, shrinking social networks in adulthood are by choice. The older adults make the most of their emotional well-being by becoming progressively selective in their social contacts and interventions to control whether cognitive debility can be prohibited or even upturned caused in substantial development for a substantial proportion of individuals.
I believe the answer is: <span>Symbolic Interactionism
Symbolic interactionism put a heavy emphasis on the role of language in the formation of children's social skills.
The symbolic interactionist believe that the usage of racial slurs since early childhood would most likely make the children become dessentized of the impact that the slurs could create, and increase the likelihood of racially insensitive behavior.</span>
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
