Explanation:
Overview
The Compromise of 1850 acted as a temporary truce on the issue of slavery, primarily addressing the status of newly acquired territory after the Mexican-American War.
Under the Compromise, California was admitted to the Union as a free state; the slave trade was outlawed in Washington, D.C., a strict new Fugitive Slave Act compelled citizens of free states to assist in capturing enslaved people; and the new territories of Utah and New Mexico would permit white residents to decide whether to allow slavery.
Ultimately, the Compromise did not resolve the issue of slavery’s expansion; instead, the fiery rhetoric surrounding the Compromise further polarized the North and the South.
Answer:
"If we wish to be free...we must fight!” (Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
According to a different source, this question refers to the text "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" by Patrick Henry. Part A asks for the central main idea of this speech, and the answer is: <em>"When peace and reconciliation are not options, fighting for freedom is the only other way."</em>
Therefore, based on this fact, we can conclude that the quote that best supports this main idea is: <em>"If we wish to be free...we must fight!” (Paragraph 3). </em>
In this quote, Patrick Henry expresses his feelings regarding the task that the colonist have ahead of them if they want to achieve freedom. Henry discusses the different ways in which the colonists have tried to help their situation. However, he makes it clear that the moment for peace and reconciliation has passed, and that if the colonists want freedom, then the only option available to them is to fight.
The first foreign oppressor God used to punish Israel for their sin was Mesopotamia is TRUE.
Joseph Touma is one of the founders of the organization <em>Bridge the Divide</em>. This organization attempts to foster discussions between young Republicans and young Democrats. The founders believe that the political environment of the United States is too divided, and that by fostering these discussions, they might be able to help diminish such divisions. He argues that they want a "trickle-up effect," which means that they hope that such a change will first happen among citizens and individuals, and that the movement will eventually reach politicians at higher levels.
I believe that <em>Bridge the Divide</em> will be successful in achieving this goal. I think that most politicians act in a way that they believe is desired by their constituents. If politicians encourage division between political parties, it is often because citizens also have this polarized view. If citizens demand more moderation and dialogue, then politicians would most likely act in this way in order to gain more votes.
