If g(x)=−3x+9 g ( x ) = − 3 x + 9 and f(x)=2x+7 f ( x ) = 2 x + 7 , what is the value of g(f(x)) g ( f ( x ) ) ?

laiz [17]

2.32 x 10⁵ = 232000

This can be solved by multiplying 2.32 to the product of 10 multiplied 5 times.

10⁵ = 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 *10
10⁵ = 100,000

2.32 x 100000 = 232000

The given equation is the standard form of a decimal number. It is used to write down a very large or very small number easily.

There are a lot of standard forms. Like: Standard form of an equation and Standard form of a polynomial.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A.

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

Angela, a proportion is two equal ratios, kinda like 3/4 = 6/8.

If we call the number of cars c, then our proportion is 3/10 = c/100.

Cross multiplying, we get 10c = 300.

Dividing both sides by 10, c = 30.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Given a function <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=f%28x%29%3D3x%5E4-5x%5E2%2B2x-3" id="TexFormula1" title="f(x)=3x^4-5x^2+2x-3"

Levart [38]

Answer:

$\huge\boxed{f(-1) = -7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve for this function, we need to substitute in our value of x inside to find f(x). Since we are trying to evalue f(-1), we will substitute -1 in as x to our equation.

$f(-1) = 3(-1)^4 - 5(-1)^2 + 2(-1) - 3$

Now we can solve for the function by multiplying/subtracting/adding our known values.

Starting with the first term to the last term:

$3(-1)^4 = 3$

WAIT! How is this possible? $-1^4 = -1$ (according to my calculator), and $3 \cdot -1 = -3$ , not 3!

It's important to note that taking a power of a negative number and multiplying a negative number are two different things. Let's use $-2^2$ as an example.

What your calculator did was follow BEMDAS since it wasn't explicitly told not to.

BEMDAS:

- Brackets

- Exponents

- Multiplication/Division

- Addition/Subtraction

Examining the equation, your calculator used this rule properly. Note that exponents come over multiplication.

So rather than being "-2 squared" - it's "the negative of of 2 squared."

Tying this back into our problem, the squared method would only be true if it looks like $-1^4$ . However, since we're substituting in -1, it looks like $(-1)^4$ , so the expression reads out as "-1 to the fourth."