How would i graph the solution set for 1/3x (greater than or equal to) y+2?
1 answer:
1/3x ≥ y + 2
You’ll have to transform the equation into its slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, so that you could graph the line. Set y to “=“
1/3x = y + 2
Subtract 2 from both sides
1/3x -2 = y + 2- 2
1/3x - 2 = y or y = 1/3x - 2
Next, to graph the solid line, you need at least two points to plot. We can start with the y-intercept, (0, -2). Another point to use is the x-intercept. To solve for the x-intercept, (a, 0), set y = 0:
0 = 1/3x - 2
Add 2 on both sides:
0 + 2 = 1/3x - 2 + 2
2 = 1/3x
Multiply both sides by 3 to solve for x:
2(3) = (3) 1/3x
6 = x
Therefore, the x-intercept = (6,0).
Plot the intercepts on the graph and connect those two points to create line.
Next, to identify which half-plane region to shade, choose a convenient test point (not on the line) to see whether it part of the solution. We could use the point of origin, (0, 0). Substitute its values into the linear inequality:
1/3x ≥ y + 2
1/3(0) ≥ (0) + 2
0 ≥ 2 (false statement). Therefore, you must shade the half-plane region where it doesn’t contain the test point, (0, 0).
Attached is the graph where it shows that the shaded lower half-plane region.
Please mark my answers as the Brainliest if you find my explanations helpful :)
You’ll have to transform the equation into its slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, so that you could graph the line. Set y to “=“
1/3x = y + 2
Subtract 2 from both sides
1/3x -2 = y + 2- 2
1/3x - 2 = y or y = 1/3x - 2
Next, to graph the solid line, you need at least two points to plot. We can start with the y-intercept, (0, -2). Another point to use is the x-intercept. To solve for the x-intercept, (a, 0), set y = 0:
0 = 1/3x - 2
Add 2 on both sides:
0 + 2 = 1/3x - 2 + 2
2 = 1/3x
Multiply both sides by 3 to solve for x:
2(3) = (3) 1/3x
6 = x
Therefore, the x-intercept = (6,0).
Plot the intercepts on the graph and connect those two points to create line.
Next, to identify which half-plane region to shade, choose a convenient test point (not on the line) to see whether it part of the solution. We could use the point of origin, (0, 0). Substitute its values into the linear inequality:
1/3x ≥ y + 2
1/3(0) ≥ (0) + 2
0 ≥ 2 (false statement). Therefore, you must shade the half-plane region where it doesn’t contain the test point, (0, 0).
Attached is the graph where it shows that the shaded lower half-plane region.
Please mark my answers as the Brainliest if you find my explanations helpful :)
You might be interested in
The first thing we are going to do is find the area of the field. To do this we are going to use the area of a square formula: 
Were
is the area in square kilometers
is one of the sides of the square
We know for our problem that the side lengths of the field are 0.9 kilometers, so
. Lets replace that value in our formula to find :
Now, to find the population density of the filed, we are going to use the population density formula:
where
is the population density in <span>in burrows per square kilometer
</span>
is the number of burrows
is the are of the field
We know that
and , so lets replace those values in our formula:
We can conclude that the <span>density of prairie dog burrows is approximately 2444 burrws per square kilometer.</span>
Were
We know for our problem that the side lengths of the field are 0.9 kilometers, so
Now, to find the population density of the filed, we are going to use the population density formula:
where
</span>
We know that
We can conclude that the <span>density of prairie dog burrows is approximately 2444 burrws per square kilometer.</span>