What is the answer to 56,763 rounding to the nearest thousand

Mathematics

2 answers:

nika2105 [10]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

60000

Step-by-step explanation:

56763 so you're going to take that number and you're going to run it to the nearest thousands by doing that you're going to take the six and six is either closest to zero or 10 and it is closer to 10 which would be your answer so you're going to add these zero replacing the six seven six and three in the equation and making me five of six by adding the one from the number 10 if you have any other questions text me if that doesn't make sense

USPshnik [31]2 years ago

5 0

The answer is 57,000 !!

explanation: in 56,763, 6 is in the thousands place. next to in the hundreds place is a 7, so you’d round 6 up to 7 to get 57,000 because 7 is greater than 5 :)

You might be interested in

If a 7% saline solution and a 4% saline solution are mixed to make 500 milliliters of a 5% saline solution, how much of each sol

Bogdan [553]

<span>The answer is 167 milliliters of 7% solution and 333 milliliters of 4% solution x + y = 500 x = 500 - y 0.07x + 0.04y = 25 (substitute 500 - y for x) 0.07(500 - y) + 0.04y = 25 35 - 0.07y + 0.04y = 25 -0.03y + 35 = 25 -0.03y = -10 y = 333.333... y [ = about 333 x = 500 - y = 500 - 333 = 167 hope it helps </span>

3 0

3 years ago

I’m need this worked out step by step by tonight

Pie

9514 1404 393

Answer:

-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3

Step-by-step explanation:

This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:

-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7

Multiply all parts by 2.

-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14

Add 5 to all parts.

-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19

Divide all parts by 3.

-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...

|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0

Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.

For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...

|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤

If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:

|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0

Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.