Answer:
A) = 4.7 × 10⁻⁴atm
Explanation:
Given that,
Kp = 1.5*10³ at 400°C
partial pressure pN2 = 0.10 atm
partial pressure pH2 = 0.15 atm
To determine:
Partial pressure pNH3 at equilibrium
The decomposition reaction is:-
2NH3(g) ↔N2(g) + 3H2(g)
Kp = [pH2]³[pN2]/[pNH3]²
pNH3 =√ [(pH2)³(pN2)/Kp]
pNH3 = √(0.15)³(0.10)/1.5*10³ = 4.74*10⁻⁴ atm
![K_p = \frac{[pH_2] ^3[pN_2]}{[pNH_3]^2} \\pNH_3 = \sqrt{\frac{(pH_2)^3(pN_2)}{pNH_3} } \\pNH_3 = \sqrt{\frac{(0.15)^3(0.10)}{1.5 \times 10^3} } \\=4.74 \times 10^-^4atm](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_p%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5BpH_2%5D%20%5E3%5BpN_2%5D%7D%7B%5BpNH_3%5D%5E2%7D%20%5C%5CpNH_3%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B%28pH_2%29%5E3%28pN_2%29%7D%7BpNH_3%7D%20%7D%20%5C%5CpNH_3%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B%280.15%29%5E3%280.10%29%7D%7B1.5%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E3%7D%20%7D%20%5C%5C%3D4.74%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E-%5E4atm)
= 4.7 × 10⁻⁴atm
Answer:
Kₐ = 6.7 x 10⁻⁴
Explanation:
First lets write the equilibrium expression, Ka , for the dissociation of hydrofluoric acid:
HF + H₂O ⇄ H₃O⁺ + F⁻
Kₐ = [ H₃O⁺ ] [ F⁻ ] /[ [ HF ]
Since we are given the pH we can calculate the [ H₃O⁺ ] ( pH = - log [ H₃O⁺ ] , and because the acid dissociates into a 1: 1 relation , we will also have [F⁻ ]. The [ HF ] is given in the question so we have all the information that is needed to compute Kₐ.
pH = -log [ H₃O⁺ ]
1.68 = - log [ H₃O⁺ ]
Taking antilog to both sides of this equation:
10^-1.68 = [ H₃O⁺ ] ⇒ 2.1 X 10⁻² M= [ H₃O⁺ ]
[ F⁻ ] = 2.1 X 10⁻² M
Solving for Kₐ :
Kₐ = ( 2.1 X 10⁻² ) x ( 2.1 X 10⁻² ) / 0.65 = 6.7 x 10⁻⁴
(Rounded to two significant figures, the powers of 10 have infinite precision )
Answer:
3
Explanation:
you must multiply everything out till everything is equal on both sides
respiratory and lymphatic
Answer:
(1) addition of HBr to 2-methyl-2-pentene
Explanation:
In this case, we will have the formation of a <u>carbocation</u> for each molecule. For molecule 1 we will have a <u>tertiary carbocation</u> and for molecule 2 we will have a <u>secondary carbocation</u>.
Therefore the <u>most stable carbocation</u> is the one produced by the 2-methyl-2-pentene. So, this molecule would react faster than 4-methyl-1-pentene. (See figure)
