1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
12

Nbayoungboy is the best at what

Law
1 answer:
alekssr [168]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: he is really good at making songs, and he’s good at everything

You might be interested in
Is second appeal possible in order?.
Step2247 [10]

Only when a significant legal issue arises can a second appeal be made. Every appeal has a specific window of time in which it must be submitted.

<h3>Can you make a second appeal of the same ruling?</h3>

You can usually only appeal to the court that is directly above the trial court that made the decision in your case; whether you can appeal your case more than once depends on a variety of different criteria. However, the appeal may not always be heard by the appeals court.

<h3>What is the appeals ceiling?</h3>

There is a time limit for each appeal that it must be submitted within. The Limitation Act of 1963 includes such a restriction. The following limitation applies to appeals of civil judgments issued by subordinate courts: 90 days following the date of the decree are allowed for a High Court appeal.

To know more about  appeal visit:

brainly.com/question/8643122

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Are you amazing? Answer because you are
frutty [35]

Answer:

I will answer for the points...

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Rite
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs.

Explanation:

More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs are the changes have been observing in the society  as comparison to the last three years. Technology such as transportation, devices, medical and other industrial instruments and media devices are more advanced as compared to previous years. Due to these devices, people depend more on technology which is a source of easiness as well as causes adverse effect on health of people.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain the impact that increasing number of social grants may have on:<br> 3.4.2 Teen mothers
ehidna [41]

The impact that increasing number of social grants may have on teen mothers is:

  • It would lead to more teenage births so they can depend on the government.

<h3>What is Social Grant?</h3>

This refers to the government cash incentive to take care of a particular social problem.

With this in mind, we can see that because of the increase in social grants, this can have an adverse impact on teenage mothers as they might have an incentive to give birth to more children and depend on the government.

Read more about social grants here:
brainly.com/question/4869427

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Argue for or against the author's claim that "it is every eligible American citizen's civic responsibility to vote." Support you
    15·1 answer
  • Why wasn’t a bill of rights included in the original constitution?
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think the crime control model or the due process model is better for society? Why? 15 lines
    5·1 answer
  • Can crimes truly be victimless?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain Why do we need to overhaul and <br> simplify the law
    15·1 answer
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • A goal that is attainable for one person may be unattainable for another.<br> True<br> False
    9·1 answer
  • How does the fact that the court cannot set an agenda complement its reactionary nature?
    12·1 answer
  • Hiiiiiiiiiii how are yall doing and how is your day
    15·1 answer
  • Hi. how are you am under the water help me am drowning ​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!