You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
1-3x+8y
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply y and 2
Multiply y and 1
The y just gets copied along.
2*y evaluates to 2y
Multiply x and 4
Multiply x and 1
The x just gets copied along.
The answer is x
4*x evaluates to 4x
2*y-4*x evaluates to 2y-4x
The answer is 2y-4x+8
2*y-4*x+8 evaluates to 2y-4x+8
Multiply y and 6
Multiply y and 1
The y just gets copied along.
The answer is y
6*y evaluates to 6y
2y + 6y = 8y
The answer is 8y-4x+8
2*y-4*x+8+6*y evaluates to 8y-4x+8
-4x + x = -3x
The answer is -3x+8y+8
2*y-4*x+8+6*y+x evaluates to -3x+8y+8
8 - 7 = 1
The answer is 1-3x+8y
2*y-4*x+8+6*y+x-7 evaluates to 1-3x+8y
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
acid=16.5 % of 348
=0.165×348
≈57.4 ml
<span>The total distance traveled and the time spent driving on the trip can be represented by both a relation and a function</span>
Answer:
oh you do 3 - 8 witch equals -3=x minus 6 = -9
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
