<span>A behavioral economist is of the mindset that people make errors, and that those errors happen repeatedly throughout time. This is a systematic form of error. A behavioral economist might think that people are driven to things that tempt them, and might argue that people can be reckless in that sense. They would view people as wanting products that vary and cannot easily be determined based on data.</span>
Answer:
d. Aquinas’s use of dialectical method.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. Aquinas’s lack of faith in God.
b. Aquinas’s deliberate imitation of liturgical practice.
c. Aquinas’s insistence that his readers accept revealed truth.
d. Aquinas’s use of dialectical method.
The main thing that this statement from Aquinas shows is that he employs the dialectical method. The dialectical method, or simply, dialectics, is a method that attempts to mimic discourse between two people who hold different points of view. When using this system, it is assumed that both people want to establish the truth about a matter through reasonable and sound arguments. In this example, Aquinas is employing it in order to get to the truth of whether there is a God.
The <u> mercantilism </u>theory is based on the assumption that the wealth of the world is fixed.
It was first published as An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, more generally known as The Wealth of Nations. The book was written by BY Adam Smith, a Scottish moral philosopher by profession, to explain the industrialized capitalism system.
According to mercantilism, wealth was set and limited. The only way to succeed was to stockpile gold and impose tariffs on imports.
This theory suggests that nations should sell their products to other nations while making no purchases in return. Predictably, nations entered into cycles of retaliatory tariffs that stifled global trade.
To learn more about mercantilism click here:
brainly.com/question/909450
#SPJ4
