Since 3 squared is 9 and 4 squared is 16, the square root of 13 will fall somewhere between 3 and 4
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
The profit is originally 250% to maintain this you need to multiply the new unit cost by 2.5.
New unit cost $1.25. * 2.5 = $3.12.5
$20 × 1.8 (180% in decimal form) = 36
$36 is how much you spent the 2nd
Brainliest please!
