Answer:
2.64 m/s
Explanation:
Given that a 600 kilogram great "yellow" shark swimming to the right at a speed of 3 meters traveled each second as it tries to get lunch. An unsuspecting 100 kilogram blue fin tuna is minding its own business swimming to the left at a speed of 0.5 meters traveled each second. GULP! After the great "yellow" shark "collides" with the blue fin tuna
Momentum = MV
Momentum of the yellow shark before collision = 600 × 3 = 1800 kgm/s
Momentum of the tun final before collision = 100 × 0.5 = 50 kgm/s
Total momentum before collision = 1800 + 50 = 1850 kgm/s
Let's assume that they move together after collision. Then,
1850 = ( 600 + 100 ) V
1850 = 700V
V = 1850 / 700
V = 2.64285 m/s
Therefore, the momentum of the shark after collision is 2.64 m/ s approximately
Answer: Provided in the explanation
Explanation:
I have understood that I have been influenced by the 'affinity bias' for quite a while. It caused me to feel fascination and feel better and right about individuals who had comparable intrigue and thought designs. I sort of began to feel this is the one for me based on those likenesses yet later used to be miserable when I comprehended that those similitudes are not many and insufficient consistently. I have begun to beat this inclination by rehearsing self reflection. I have begun to think about what causes me to feel pulled in to somebody and on the off chance that I introspect that it's exclusively founded on likenesses, at that point I cause myself to get that and monitoring that helps in escaping the inclination.
I make an effort not to get into the snare of paradoxes in my own announcements yet I have been forced to bear deceptions during contentions. One deception which I have encountered most is the 'Foul play' error as there have been a great deal of occurrences when individuals began to tear down me and my family when they couldn't win on a contention regarding balanced and rationale.
Basic reasoning causes us in understanding our defects and those issues of our own which keeps us from taking better choices and furthermore forestalls us tackling issues in more successful manners. Through basic reasoning, one can reflect and recognize utilization of deceptions in the contentions and that will help him in deciphering the circumstance from an alternate perspective. He will assess the circumstance better and through appropriate induction, he will have the option to get over those issues in thinking and subsequently, have the option to take better and more powerful choices for taking care of an issue.
The most fascinating idea which I have learned is that of the utilization of reflection or explicitly self reflection to comprehend ourselves better and furthermore to display basic reasoning appropriately. Being said that, I am a still somewhat confused about the manners by which we can reflect appropriately at each circumstance in a successful manner. This disarray remains in light of the fact that most deceptions and predispositions are oblivious in nature while the basic considering aptitudes reflection is cognizant and I meander whether a cognizant ability will have the option to break down and distinguish each oblivious inclinations or whether a few guards will keep a few inclinations covered up.
Given :
A mover slides a refrigerator weighing 650 N at a constant velocity across the floor a distance of 8.1 m.
The force of friction between the refrigerator and the floor is 230 N.
To Find :
How much work has been performed by the mover on the refrigerator.
Solution :
Since, refrigerator is moving with constant velocity.
So, force applied by the mover is also 230 N ( equal to force of friction ).
Now, work done in order to move the refrigerator is :
Hence, this is the required solution.
The unmagnetized pieces of iron would be randomly pointing to directions, this is true because although influenced with the magnetic domain, the direction of the unmagnetized iron field of attraction is not uniform or does not have preferred direction.
Explanation:
... in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the force on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object. The direction of the force on the first object is opposite to the direction of the force on the second object. Forces always come in pairs - equal and opposite action-reaction force pairs.
