<span>que debería haber escrito sólo el problema para nosotros tal vez podríamos haber ayudado a continuación .</span>
Answer:
There are 108 inches in 9 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, two unit multipliers mean we have to convert through two units before we arrive at our final answer so we can convert from feet to yards to inches!
We know that 3 feet equal a yard, right?
So we can divide 9 by 3 to get the amount that 9 feet translates to in yards.

So we are now done with our first conversion! Our second is going to be from yards to inches!
There are 36 inches in 1 yard so we should multiply 3 by 36 to get the amount in inches!

-5+-12 is -17
For lack of a better metaphor, it's like digging a pit deeper than it already is.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given - In selecting a sulfur concrete for roadway construction in regions that experience heavy frost, it is important that the chosen concrete has a low value of thermal conductivity in order to minimize subsequent damage due to changing temperatures. Suppose two types of concrete, a graded aggregate and a no-fines aggregate, are being considered for a certain road. The table below summarizes data on thermal conductivity from an experiment carried out to compare the two types of concrete.
Type ni xi si
Graded 42 0.486 0.187
No-fines 42 0.359 0.158
To find - a. Formulate the above in terms of a hypothesis testing problem.
b. Give the test statistic and its reference distribution (under the null hypothesis).
c. Report the p-value of the test statistic and use it to assess the evidence that this sample provides on the scientific question of difference in mean conductivity of the two materials at the 5% level of significance.
Proof -
a.)
Hypothesis testing problem :
H0 : There is significant difference between mean conductivity for the graded concrete and mean conductivity for the no fines concrete.
H1 : There is no significant difference between mean conductivity for the graded concrete and mean conductivity for the no fines concrete.
b)
Test statistic :




⇒Z(cal) = 3.3687
Z(tab) = 1.96
As Z (cal) > Z(tab)
So, we reject H0 at 5% Level of significance
p-value = 0.99962
Hence
There is significant difference in mean conductivity at the two materials.