Answer:
0.88 (I think this is how Mrs. Futch wants it to be written)
Step-by-step explanation:
h=-16t^2+14t
(Substitute h with 0)
0=-16t^2+14t
(Factor)
0=2t(-8t+7)
2t=0 -8t+7=0
t=0 t=0.88
{0, 0.88}
(John Komperda)
Answer:
no enough evidence to draw up a conclusion
Step-by-step explanation:
Data:
let:
= decay after 2 weeks
= decay after 16 weeks
Making the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis; 
the deviation = 0.05
the standard difference = 4
Conditions:
The normal distribution curve can be plotted on a graph and the plot shows that the distribution is a skewed distribution.
Then,

Therefore, it can be concluded that 0.1983 > 0.05. This presents our failure to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that polyester decays more in less than 2 weeks.
Answer:
naniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Answer:
Assuming the numerator was 1.

Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the numerator was 1.

Answer:
The answer is 9
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is 9