Answer:
B) plan 1 : worker earning y = x - 0.14 , unit labor = 
plan 2 : worker earning y = 0.5x + 0.5, unit labor = (0.5x + 0.5) / x
C) At 128%
D ) plan D IS PREFERABLE
Explanation:
In the first case Benefits are split : 30% to worker , 70% to company ( up to 120% ) performance
In the second case benefits 50% go to the worker and 50% go the company
B) The equations for worker earnings and normalized unit labor costs for each scheme
Plan 1 :
y ( percentage earning of worker ) = 1
unit labor cost = Y / 1
y = 0 - 30
unit labor = 0.3 / x
y = x - 0.14 therefore unit labor =
plan 2 :
y ( percentage earning of worker ) = 1, y = 0.5x + 0.5
unit labor cost : Y / 1 = (0.5x + 0.5) / x
C ) The point at which the two plans break even
0.5x + 0.5 = x - 0.14
0.5 + 0.14 = x - 0.5x
0.64 = x(1 - 0.5 )
x = 0.64 / 0.5 = 1.28 = 128%
D) The company would prefer plan 1
Answer:
Market sell order for 1,500 shares
Explanation:
The type of order that Marcos should place is Market sell order for 1,500 shares because he already owns 1,500 shares of the ABC stock in which the ABC stock shares was purchased at $44 per share.
Since the stock has been decreasing in value in which he wants to cut his losses now because the stock price may continue to decrease, the best thing for him to do is to use the Market sell order for the 1,500 shares in order to cut the losses that may arise and to avoid losing all the Total amount of the shares bought which is $66,000 ( 1,500 shares ×$44).
Answer and Explanation:
1. Business implication: if there are no trade barriers, it would enable them get better raw materials for their business and increase customer base
Legal anti trust implication: lobbying is illegal in some countries
2. Business implication: this would attract more manufacturers who were not previously members of the association which would in turn promote the goals of the association in improving trade amongst the manufacturers
Legal anti trust implication: associatio may be exposed to legal examination, example increased regulations
3 business implications:sales territories would invariably create a safe and secure investment for manufacturers such that there is less cost of marketing and campaigning as consumers are guaranteed
Legal implications: this is against anti trust laws and goes against free trade policies and illegal monopoly
4 business implications: boycotting this supplier could create an alternative source of raw materials which wouldn't be as efficient and even cost more
Legal implications: boycotting a large supplier such as this who might have a political backing might bring political retaliations from the supplier's political proxies who might create other regulations in the supplier's favour
Answer:
The invested amount is $187,412.68
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that have to invested is shown below:
Amount = Paid amount × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
where,
The Paid amount is $160,000
rate of interest is 4% ÷ 12 = 0.33%
And, the number of years is = 4 × 12 = 48
Now the invested amount is
= $160,000 × (1 + 0.33%)^48
= $187,412.68
Hence, the invested amount is $187,412.68
Answer:
move somewhere near Nevada.
hangout with grandkids.
have fun with my s/oand never get boring.
