Given parameters:
Fraction given to charity = 
Fraction given to wife = 
Unknown:
Fraction given to son and daughter =?
Solution:
Let the total property = x
Fraction given to charity = 
Fraction given to wife = 
The remaining was given to son and daughter = F
So;
Total property = fraction given to charity + fraction given to wife + fraction given to son and daughter
x = 
F = x - (
)
F = 0
The son and daughter will not inherit anything
A. It is an experiment as the sales director is applying treatment ( the training ) to a group and recording the results.
B. I would have 250 sales representatives from each region take the training and 250 from each region to not take it so i can be able to see if it affects both regions differently. The representatives from each region would be chosen at random and the length of their training would be the same for all.
C. now you would only be able to have 200 people from each region train. this would lower the percentage of the impact the training had on the amount of sales ( if any) . For example, if the original 250 trained people in a region increased the sales in that region by 20 percent and 50 of those people ended up not actually training, the sales would have only increased by 16 percent.
D. correlational research is best to establish causality. for example, the amount of training the representatives got may affect how much they are able to sell. also the number of representatives trained may affect the amount sold
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The technical probability of rolling any number on a standard die is 1/6 because there's six numbers. Based on that, since he rolled a "4" on 5 tosses, it seems likely that it's 30 times, because 1/6 of 30 is 5. I haven't done probability in awhile but if I remember correctly that should be right
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "The reason for the difference can not be determined with the information that is given." Looking at the scatter plot of pages versus amazon price, it appears that the data might be clustered around two separate regression lines. The cause of the split in the data is that <span> the difference can not be determined with the information that is given</span>
Answer:
<h3>B. The number of people who attended the mathematics conference was more than 225.</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the inequality m > 225, the inequality means that m is greater than 225. Since the inequality sign does not include equal to sign, then the value of m cannot be less than and equal to 225. The situation that best fits the expression based on the explanation above is "The number of people who attended the mathematics conference was more than 225"
Emphasis should be on 'WAS MORE THAN' according to the statement. The greater sign means that the number of people will always be greater than or more than 225 representing the variable <em>m as the number of people.</em>
