Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
Based on the options given, the answer is d.get involved in extracurricular activities.
Joining extracurricular activities and organizations may help them choose what they love to do and explore various options. Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
This is an example of a change in perception.
Once she changed the way she looks at the problem, the problem instantly changed, or rather, disappeared, in Mary's case. She doesn't view math as a terrible chore anymore, but rather as a fun challenge, which means that her perception of math changed.
Answer:
$387.40
Explanation:
FICA Taxes ($2,600 x 7.65%) $198.90
State Unemployment Taxes $162.50
Federal Unemployment Tax $26.00
Employer's payroll tax expense for the week $387.40
Social Security and Medicare are combined called as FICA taxes and employer made the same contribution as of employee.
State and Federal Unemployment Tax is solely for employer only.
The rest are employee related taxes.
I think may b not sure c is correct
