Need help I got 23,294 as the answer but it’s not an option please explain how you got the answer.

Mathematics

1 answer:

OLEGan [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculation seems correct to me, with d the distance and h the height of the plane, and i got the same value. Closest value is A tho, so i'd stick with it.

If you want to be pedantic about it, you can always divide the heigth by each value, and get the inverse tangent of each value. With A you get 17.995 which seems the best value you get

You might be interested in

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

x=81.25, A=65, B=94, C=21

Step-by-step explanation:

corresponding angles of similar triangles are equal, hence angle measurements of A, B, and C. To solve for x, set up a ratio (60/48=x/65) and solve

6 0

4 years ago

~please only answer if you know for sure~

NARA [144]

JKL is similar to PQR

so they want PR

JKL is similar to PQR

So PR is similar to JL

And they also give us the sides KL and QR

JKL is similar to PQR

Both of those sides are similar, so we can form a proportion.

$\sf { \frac{PR}{JL} = \frac{QR}{KL} }$

Plug in the numbers:

$\sf { \frac{PR}{6} = \frac{15}{9} }$

Cross multiply:

$\sf{ PR \times 9 = 6 \times 15}$

Isolate PR

$\sf{ PR = \frac{6 \times 15}{9}}$

Simplify it

$\sf{ PR = 10}$

So your final answer is

$\boxed{\bf{10 centimeters}}$

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3tanx +cotx >5cscx, 0°<x<180°

Gnoma [55]

3+5+172=180 tancxkxkfk

6 0

4 years ago

Write an expression that is equivalent to 3(2n+3)+9

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

One expression you can do, is to simply simplify the expression,

We can deistribute the 3
6n+9+9

You can then simplify further:
6n+18

Once we have the simplified expression, you can then expnd it in different ways for example:
3(2n+6)

Hope these helped!

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. Marla coloured 1/4 of a picture, and Suman painted some, too. When they were finished, 2/3 of the picture still needed to be

Llana [10]

Answer: 3/7 sorry if wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago