Answer:
Your answer is <u>A. development directors</u>
Hope this helps!
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice. On the other hand, the answer for the second question is the second choice. I hope my answers has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
a) If bribes cost $1,000 each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes?
So, if the corrupt inspector approves two newly built structures each week, ti means that he is bribed twice per week. There are 52 weeks in a year, so he gets a total of 104 bribes (52 x 2). If each bribe costs $1,000, then he makes a total of: $1,000 x 104 = $104,000 in bribes per year.
c) Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets.
This statement is true. Corrupt officials will want to have private companies they can obtain bribes from provide government services. It increases the probability of them making money from bribes.
d) What if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from $1,000 to $1,500?
Reducing the number of inspectors in hafl means that each inspector now gets twice the bribes. Because the equilibrium price did not double as did the quantity of bribes, each inspector will make less money than expected, but they will still the incentive to collect all the four bribes per week.
<u>Answer</u>:
<u>Should create a non disclosure agreement policy</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is a legally binding agreement that mandates parties to a contract in this case between an employer with an employee, in which the employee agrees not to disclose publicly or to any one negative information about the company that is deemed confidential (secret or private), and that may affect the company negatively.
Thus, to reduce the worries of the board and CEO, Joanie should create a non disclosure agreement signed by employees.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The question is saying, 'fit for you' therefore I think this is about the owner and not necessarily the consumer hence the potential owner should go and shadow
