The given statement is false because it isn't an empty set!
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
We have following sets of inequalities:

From
we get ,

Therefore solution set is x=2.
Now, for
we get ,

Therefore solution set is x>2.
For
we get ,

Therefore solution set is x<2.
Now, the union of x=2, x<2 & x>2 is -∞<x<∞. i.e. all possible values of x. And so above statement is false because it isn't an empty set!
Step-by-step explanation:
- Let
be the smallest integer
- Let
be the larger integer
As the sum of the reciprocals of the two positive integers is frac 3/16
So,



Simplify






So,

<h2>Verification:</h2>






Therefore,

Keywords: word problem
, integer
Learn more about solving integer word problem from brainly.com/question/10905225
#learnwithBrainly
Pythagorean Theorem is for triangles not circles.
The equation of a circle is (x - h)² + (y - k)² = radius² where (h, k) is the center.
Plug in your given information and simplify.
(x - (- 1))² + (y - 2)² = (3)²
(x + 1)² + (y - 2)² = 9 is your equation.
Effective interest rate is
R=((1+0.1185÷52)^(52)−1)×100=12.57%
How much greater
12.57−11.85=0.72%