9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Money held by individuals in savings accounts is part of the M2 money supply, but not part ofthe M1 money supply. Therefore, when Jane withdraws $500 cash from her savings account,the M1 money supply increases by $500. However, the M2 money supply does not changebecause the M1 money supply is included as part of the M2 money supply.b. Money held by banks and governments is not included as part of the money supply. Therefore,when Jane uses $300 to pay her income tax to the U.S. Treasury, that total of $300 is taken out ofboth the M1 and M2 money supplies. When Jane deposits the remaining cash ($80) into hersavings account, the M1 money supply is reduced by that amount, but it does not affect the M2money supply. Therefore, Jane's actions cause the M2 money supply to change by $300 (theamount used to pay her taxes) and the M1 money supply to change by $380 (the amount used topay her taxes plus the amount that was deposited into her savings account). Note that it does notmatter that Jane no longer has the $120 she used to pay for the gold clubs, as the funds remainsin someone else's checking account. So this amount is neither removed from the M1 moneysupply nor the M2 money supply.NumericResponseDifficulty: 03 HardLearning Objective: 1402 List anddescribe the components of the U.S.money supply.5000380300References
Answer:
6/3 I think so try c and if it’s not I’m not sure
Step-by-step explanation:
:)
Answer:
155v^4
Step-by-step explanation:
