Determine if the triangles can be proved congruent, if possible, by SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, or HL

A bottle contains 30 fluid ounces of orange juice and 18 fluid ounces of pineapple juice. Which graph has a slope that best repr

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

option B. G

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

y ---->ounces of orange juice

x ---> ounces of pineapple juice

we know that

The ratio of orange juice to pineapple juice is equal to

$ratio=\frac{y}{x}$

substitute the given values

$ratio=\frac{30}{18}$

simplify

$ratio=\frac{5}{3}=1.67$

Verify each graph

Remember that the formula of slope is "rise over run", where the "rise" (means change in y, up or down) and the "run" (means change in x, left or right)

we have

$ratio=\frac{5}{3}$

that means

5 ounces of orange juice per 3 ounces of pineapple juice

Graph F

The slope is

$m=\frac{4}{6}=\frac{2}{3}=0.67$

Graph G

The slope is

$m=\frac{4}{2}=\frac{2}{1}=2$

Graph H

The slope is

$m=\frac{70}{6}=\frac{35}{3}=11.67$

Graph J

The slope is

$m=\frac{12}{10}=\frac{6}{5}=1.2$

The value of 2 is the value closest to 1.67

therefore

The graph that has a slope that best represents the ratio of orange juice to pineapple juice is Graph G

7 0

3 years ago

HELP PLEASE 50 POINTS Write your personal reaction to this event. An embarrassing moment

Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

is it an essay writing????

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can an acute and obtuse angle be supplementary? Draw a figure showing supplementary angles?

uysha [10]

Yes, I will list acute first (<90) and obtuse second (>90) and they need to add to 180

10 and 170
20 and 160
30 and 150
40 and 140
50 and 130
60 and 120
70 and 110
80 and 100 and so on

8 0

3 years ago

(2.5 points) The probability that an airplane accident which is due to structural failure is diagnosed correctly is 0.85 and the

Nikitich [7]

Answer: 0.51

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a conditional probability. The first event is the airplane accident being caused by structural failure. The probability of it being due to structural failure is 0.3 and the probability of it not being due to structural failure is 0.7. The second event involves the diagnosis of the event. If a plane fails due to structural failure, the probability that it will be diagnosed and the results will say it was due to structural failure is 0.85, and the probability that the diagnosis is unable to identify that it was because of a structural failure is 0.15. If the plane were to fail as a result of some other reason aside structural failure, the probability that the diagnosis will show that it was as a result of structural failure is 0.35 and the probability of the diagnosis showing that is is not as a result of structural failure is 0.65. To find the probability that an airplane failed due to structural failure given that it was diagnosed that it failed due to some malfunction, this is the equation;

p = (probability of plane failing and diagnosis reporting that the failure was due to structural failure)/ (probability of diagnosis reporting that failure was due to structural failure)

p = (0.3*0.85)/((0.3*0.85) + (0.7*0.35))

p = 0.51

4 0

3 years ago

Help me please.. pleaseeeee

Mkey [24]

34lbs=544oz
5lbs>79oz

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers