The coordinates of the vertices of △PQR are P(1, 4), Q(2, 2), and R(−2, 1). The coordinates of the vertices of △P′Q′R′ are P′(−1
, 4), Q′(−2, 2), and R′(2, 1).
Which statement correctly describes the relationship between △PQR and △P′Q′R′?
1. △PQR is congruent to △P′Q′R′ because you can map △PQR to △P′Q′R′ using a translation 2 units to the left, which is a rigid motion.
2. △PQR is congruent to △P′Q′R′ because you can map △PQR to △P′Q′R′ using a reflection across the y-axis, which is a rigid motion.
3. △PQR is not congruent to △P′Q′R′ because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps △PQR to △P′Q′R′.
4. △PQR is congruent to △P′Q′R′ because you can map △PQR to △P′Q′R′ using a reflection across the x-axis, which is a rigid motion.
no links please
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
250 + 200h = 300 + 180h
200h – 180h = 300 – 250
20h = 50
H = 2.5 credit hours
Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps and good luck :))
Half of a dozen is 6. And 12+12 is 24 and 24+6 is 30. So Katoni bought 30 pencils.
Answer: 4 Ounces.
Step-by-step Explanation: I don't know the full context of the problem, but if Seth used 4 ounces, that means that he used 4 ounces all together.
Answer:
W = 16 in
Step-by-step explanation:
P = 2L + 2W
56 = 2(12) + 2W
56 = 24 + 2W
56-24 = 2W
32 = 2W
W = 32/2
W = 16 in
Best regards
I think the answer would be A