1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lorasvet [3.4K]
3 years ago
15

Blaine bought 4 pairs of pants and 2 shirts at a department store in California. Each pair of pants cost $25.85 and each shirt c

ost $15.70. Blaine was also charged an additional 6% state sales tax on the total purchase amount. How much change did Blaine receive from $200?
Business
1 answer:
Mazyrski [523]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

$57.11

Explanation:

$25.85 × 4 = $103.40

$15.70 × 2 = $31.40

Total cost of purchase = $134.80

6% tax = 0.06 × $134.80 = $8.09

Total cost of purchase including tax = $142.89

Change received by Blaine = $200 - $142.89 = $57.11

I hope my answer helps you

You might be interested in
Variable manufacturing overhead incurred was $245,000. Fixed manufacturing overhead incurred was $373,000. Actual machine-hours
steposvetlana [31]

Before information shows is the correct and complete question.

The Lopez Company use a standard costing in its manufacturing plant for the auto part. The standard cost of particular auto part based on a denominator level of a 4.000 output unit per year. included 6 machine-hours of variable manufacturing overhead at $8 per hour and 6 machine-hours of fixed manufacturing overhead at $15 per hour.

Actual output produced was 4.400 units.

Variable manufacturing overhead incurred was $245.000.

Fixed manufacturing overhead incurred was $373.000.

Actual machine-hours were 28.400.

Prepare the analysis of all variable manufacturing overhead and fixed manufacturing overhead variances.

Additional diagram attached to this question is displayed in the first image below.

Answer:

Explanation:

By using a columnar method, the analysis of all the variance & fixed manufacturing overhead varaince can be computed as follows:

Variable manufacturing overhead analysis:

Actual cost Incurred: ║ Actual input ×  Budgeted ║ Allocated: Budgeted

Actual input × Actual     rate                                        Input for actual output

rate                                                                               × Budgeted rate

245000                         28400×$8.00 = 227200      (4400×6hrs×$8)

                                                                                      = 211,200

                17800 U                    16800  U

            Spending Variance      Efficiency Variance

                                      33800 U

                                Flexible Budget Variance

Hence;

The spending Variance = $17,800 U

Efficiency Variance  = $16,000 U

Flexible Budget Varaince = $33800 U

where;   F = Favourable  & U = Unfavourable

<u>For the fixed Manufacturing Overhead:</u>

Actual cost Incurred: ║ Flexible Budget Lump ║ Allocated: Budgeted

Actual input × Actual     sum regardless of the    Input for actual output

rate                                 output level                     × Budgeted rate

                                                                             

373000                        4000×6hrs×15 = 360000  (4400×6hrs×$15)

                                                                                      = 396000

13000 U                                   36000  F

Spending Variance/               Production-Volume

Flexible budgeted variance   Variance

                                                 23000 F

                                        Over allocated fixed

                                        Overhead

Hence;

The spending Variance = $13000 U

The production Volume Variance  = $36,000 F

Over allocated fixed overhead = $23000 F

where;   F = Favourable  & U = Unfavourable

NOTE: To have a better view of the above computation in a table format, refer to the second and the third diagram in the image below.

8 0
2 years ago
A detailed plan for the future that is usually expressed in formal quantitative terms is known as a:
Kipish [7]

Answer: (A) Budget

Explanation:

 Budget is one of the type of financial plan that is create according to our requirement and also budget.

A budget is one of the type of document  that is used for describe the detailed plan in the future and it is usually expressed into the quantitative terms.

 The main objective of the budget is to creating a proper plan based on the expenses, revenue, liabilities and the cost in an organization and it also helps in balancing our expenses with the income.    

 Therefore, Budget is the correct answer.

5 0
2 years ago
Abe owns a dog; the dog's barking annoys Abe's neighbor, Jenny. Suppose that the benefit of owning the dog is worth $200 to Abe
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

Jenny pays Abe $300 to give the dog to his parents who live on an isolated farm

Explanation:

The answer is already stated within the question, but I'll provide  the explanation.

In order to reach a solution, Jenny would have to offer Abe an amount to get rid of the dog that is more than Abe's benefit of owning the dog, which is $200.

On the other hand, since Jenny bears a cost of $400 from the bark, she would only be willing to spend as much as $400 to resolve the situation. Therefore, the acceptable range for the amount of the agreement for both parts is:

$200 < X < $400.

Since $300 is within that range. Jenny paying Abe $300 to give the dog to his parents is a possible solution.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The following per unit cost information is available: direct materials $36, direct labor $24, variable manufacturing overhead $1
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Mark−up percentage = 18.75%

Explanation:

Total manufacturing cost= Direct material + Direct labor  + Variable overhead + Fixed overhead

= $36 + $24 + $18 + $40

= $118

Hence, the total manufacturing cost is $118.

Total selling cost = Fixed selling cost + Variable selling cost

Total selling cost = $28 + $14

Total selling cost = $42

Hence, the total selling cost is $42

Total cost = Total Manufacturing cost + Total selling cost

Total cost = $118 + $42

Total cost = $160

Mark−up percentage = ROI / Total cost * 100

Mark−up percentage = $30 / $160 * 100

Mark−up percentage = 0.1875 * 100

Mark−up percentage = 18.75%

7 0
2 years ago
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
podryga [215]

Answer:

Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1111122212222222 if you needed help I would help

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On the balance sheet after adjusting entries are made, the amount shown for the allowance for doubtful accounts is equal to the
    7·1 answer
  • Alonzo decides to have a yard sale to sell some of his personal items. At the sale, Alonzo sells Ralph a big screen television f
    5·2 answers
  • Plastic Pretzels stock recently paid a dividend of $1.39 per share. The dividend growth rate is expected to be 3.60% indefinitel
    9·1 answer
  • How should each instrument be changed if the fed wished to decrease the money supply?
    11·1 answer
  • What would happen to the demand curve for movie tickets if the cost of making movies increased sharply? 2. What would happen to
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a typical discounting method for manufacturers? O Seasonal sales O Volume discounts O Credit terms
    8·1 answer
  • People are more likely to purchase a consumer ratings magazine that reviews new automobiles before buying a new car than they ar
    8·1 answer
  • The Ryan Express, provider of tax services, starts operations on 1/1/17. Now that the company has been in business for more than
    10·1 answer
  • Joe decided to quit his computer-programming job (where he was earning $48,000 per year) to start his own software business. For
    5·1 answer
  • How does consumer law damage business?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!