Increase 2.75 by 1/4 percent of it please. Some brainiac on this app thinks I’m wrong.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
1) The x-axis represents the energy (), in joules. The y-axis represents the amplitude (
), in milimeters.
2) The curve depicts an <em>monotonous decrecent</em> rate of change.
3) The amplitude is directly proportional to the root square of the energy.
<h3>How to analyze a graph relationship between two variables</h3>
In this question we have a relationship between two variables, in which we must apply principles of <em>functional</em> analysis to respond three questions presented in the statement.
Now we proceed to answer the three questions below:
- <em>What is on the x-axis? The y-axis?</em> R/ The x-axis represents the energy (
), in joules. The y-axis represents the amplitude (
), in milimeters.
- <em>How would you describe the rate of change of the line?</em> R/ The curve depicts an <em>monotonous decrecent</em> rate of change, that is, the slope converges to zero when the energy tends to infinite.
- <em>What does this tell you about the relationship between amplitude and energy?</em> R/ The curve show a strong similarity with a function of the form
. Hence, the amplitude is directly proportional to the root square of the energy.
To learn more on functions, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/12431044
6. When we multiply two surdic integers, we can leave it into one big surd.
For instance, if we have:
, we can simplify it down to one uniform square root sign, 
.
So, we can say:
, which is a rational root, because the square root of 36 can be converted into an integer, namely 6 and -6.
Hence, it is a rational root.
7. The summation, on the other hand, cannot be simplified any further, so it will stay as irrational. This is because √2 is already an irrational root, and adding it onto a number that is rational will stay as irrational.
8. Once again, the summation cannot be simplified. We can only simplify by factoring like terms. Hence, this must be irrational.
9. Even if it is in fractional notation, √5 can never be a rational number because no two integers when multiplied by itself will give 5. So, even if it is written in fractional form, they cannot be rational if there is an already irrational term in it.
For instance, if we have:
So, we can say:
Hence, it is a rational root.
7. The summation, on the other hand, cannot be simplified any further, so it will stay as irrational. This is because √2 is already an irrational root, and adding it onto a number that is rational will stay as irrational.
8. Once again, the summation cannot be simplified. We can only simplify by factoring like terms. Hence, this must be irrational.
9. Even if it is in fractional notation, √5 can never be a rational number because no two integers when multiplied by itself will give 5. So, even if it is written in fractional form, they cannot be rational if there is an already irrational term in it.