Answer:
Yes, there is no need to change the eatings habits
Explanation:
Ari will maximize utility until
MU / P for both is equal in order to be at equilibrium
So, in this case,
For Hot dogs
= MU / P
where
MU is marginal utils, which is 20
P is Price, which is $2
So,
= 20 / $2
= 10
For Hamburgers
= MU / P
where
MU is marginal utils, which is 25
P is Price, which is $2.5
So,
= 25 / $2.5
= 10
Therefore, MU / P for hot dog = MU / P for Hamburger
Hence, there is not need to change the eatings habits.
Answer:
The correct answer is Production loss.
Explanation:
The quantifiable cost associated with the interruption of the operation of a pump is low when compared to the cost throughout its useful life in an installation carried out in a commercial building. However, the loss of comfort suffered by users of the building makes it advisable to have a spare pump.
Unlike what happens in production processes, stopping a pump from a commercial building almost never results in a loss of production. On the contrary, the interruption is usually translated into a loss of comfort. However, the immeasurable costs associated with downtime may be even higher if, for example, hotel guests run out of water. Therefore, it is always advisable to install a replacement pump to prevent comfort losses caused by an unexpected failure in the pumping system. The communication capabilities of electronically controlled pumps E help minimize downtime because replacement and repair work can be completed more quickly in the event of a breakdown. A backup pump is used to prevent downtime and consequent loss of comfort in the event of a breakdown.
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Answer:
rate = 6.54%
Explanation:
we need to find the rate at which a capital of 300,000 becomes 1,000,000 in a period of time of 19 years.
<u>So we build the following equation:</u>
![r=\sqrt[19]{1,000,000 \div 300,000}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Csqrt%5B19%5D%7B1%2C000%2C000%20%5Cdiv%20300%2C000%7D-1)
rate = 0.065417765 = 6.54% after rounding
This will be the rate my parent will require to generate 1,000,000 in 19 years with their current savings of 300,000.
It should be noted that the demand for orange will be elastic because when there's a change in price, there'll be a larger change in quantity demanded.
It should be noted that an elastic demand simply means a situation whereby a change in the price of a good lead to a larger change in the quantity demanded.
In this case, the demand for orange will be elastic because when there's a change in price, there'll be a larger change in quantity demanded. For example, an increase in price will make the customers buy other fruits.
Learn more about demand on:
brainly.com/question/25585026
