All categories

3 years ago

Type the correct answer in the box.

Physics

2 answers:

vfiekz [6]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:
64.4 degrees Fahrenheit

Hope this helps!

sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A car of mass 1600 kg traveling at 27.0 m/s is at the foot of a hill that rises vertically 135 m after travelling a distance of

Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Neglecting any frictional losses, the average power delivered by the car's engine is 10565 W

Explanation:

The energy conservation law indicates that the energy must be the same at the bottom of the hill and at the top of the hill.

The energy at the bottom is only the Kinect energy (K_1) of the car in motion, but in the top, the energy is the sum of its Kinect energy (K_2), potential energy (P) and the work (W) done by the engine.

$K_1 = K_2 + P + W$

then, the work done by the engine is:

$W = K_1 - K_2 - P$

The formulas for the Kinetic and potential energy are:

$K=\frac{1}{2}mV^2\\P=mgh$

where, m is the mass of the car, V the velocity, g the gravity and h is the elevation of the hill.

Using the formulas:

$W=\frac{1}{2}mV_1^2-\frac{1}{2}mV_2^2-mgh$

Replacing the values:

$W=\frac{1}{2}(1600Kg)(27m/s)^2-\frac{1}{2}(1600Kg)(14m/s)^2-(1600Kg)(9.8m/s^2)(135m)\\W=-1690400 J$

The negative of this value indicates the direction of the work done, but for the problem, you only care about the magnitude, so the power is W=1690400 J. Now, the power is equal to work/time so you need to find the time the car took to get to the top of the hill.

The average speed of the car is (27+14)/2=20m/s, and t=d/v so the time is:

$t=\frac{3200m}{20m/s}=160s$

the power delivered by the car's engine was:

$power=\frac{work}{time}=\frac{1690400J}{160s}=10565W$

8 0

4 years ago

If all the magnetic domains in a sample of ferromagnetic material point in the same direction, then around the sample we definit

Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

i dont know it i just needed to answer so yea

Explanation:

hope you get the answer .

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Measurements show a certain star has a very high luminosity (100,000 x the Sun's) while its temperature is quite cool (3500 K).

Julli [10]

what are the answer choices

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

A small block of mass M = 0.10 kg is released from rest at point 1 at a height H = 1.8 m above the bottom of a track, as shown i

Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

Explanation:

A) is not correct, because the gravitation potential energy will depend on the height the block is located at. It will be calculated with the formula:

U=mgh.

If we take the ground as a zero height reference, then on point 2 the potential energy will be:

$U_{2} = 0.10kg(9.81 m/s^{2})(0.6m)$

$U_{2}=0.59 J$

While on point 3, the potential energy will be greater.

$U_{3}=0.10kg(9.81 m/s^{2})(1.2m)$

$U_{3}=1.18 J$

B) is not the right answer because the kinetic energy will vary with the height the block is located at in the fact that the energy is conserved (this is if we don't take friction into account or air resistance) so in this case:

$U_{2}+K_{2}= U_{3}+K_{3}$

We already know the potential energy at point 2. We can calculate the kinetic energy at point 3 like this:

$K_{3} =\frac{1}{2}mv_{3}^{2}$

$K_{3} =\frac{1}{2}(0.10kg)(2.5 m/s)^{2}$

$K_{3} =0.31 J$

So the kinetic energy at point 2 is given by the equation:

$K_{2} =U_{3}-U_{2}+K_{3}$

so:

$K_{2} = (1.18J)-(0.59J)+0.31J$

$K_{2} =0.9J$

As you may see the kinetic energy at point 2 is greater than the kinetic energy at point 3.

C) Is not correct because according to the first law of thermodinamics, energy is not lost, only transformed. So, since we are not taking into account friction or any other kind of loss, then we can say that the amount of mechanical energy at point 1 is exactly the same as the mechanical energy at point 3.

D) Because of what we talked about on part C, this will be the true situation, because the mechanical energy of the block will be the same no matter theh point you measure it at.

7 0

3 years ago

Which statement accurately describes the ultraviolet catastrophe

castortr0y [4]

Answer: A hot lightbulb gave off white visible light instead of ultraviolet light.

Explanation:

3 0

4 years ago