What does the Miller-Urey experiment tell us about the origin of life?

Biology

1 answer:

Katen [24]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

B. Inorganic materials can form organic molecules under the right conditions.

Explanation:

The Miller-Urey experiment provided the first evidence that organic molecules needed for life could be formed from inorganic components.

Source: Khanacademy

You might be interested in

How does archbishop usshers work compare to that of james hutton

Nataly_w [17]

<span>James Ussher was a creative scholar, a church leader and became famous for his genuine letters of the church. He is the Archbishop of all Ireland and majorly impacted Reformation theology. He is best known for his chronology research that concluded Adam was created in 4004 B.C. In reality, Ussher was a first-class scholar very involved in scholarly research. He regularly interacted with “the most learned men of the day” to intellectually savor their ideas. He was also “a real connoisseur of books,” and there was scarcely a book in any British library that he was unfamiliar with. While James Hutton is known as the Father of Modern Geology, Hutton is a Scottish Geologist and a naturalist who originated the concept of earth’s crust during geological history, which explains the features of the Earth's crust by means of natural processes over geologic time. Hutton had formulated controversial theories of the origin of the earth and of atmospheric changes known as 'uniformitarian’s'. This paved the way for modern geological science.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

If a and b both have determinant 0, does it follow that ab has determinant 0?

Travka [436]

Yes it does follow that ab has determinant 0

7 0

4 years ago

What makes a forest sustainable?

Paladinen [302]

Answer:

Explanation:

Supply always has to be higher than demand

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

11. The arrows on the left and right sides of Figure 1 show the effects of one species on the species that are on

daser333 [38]

The image related to that question is attached below.

In the figure, we can see that on the left side, sea otters are very influential in the population of sea creatures, if the killer whales are not in the environment. That's because sea otters are strong predators of sea urchins. However, sea urchins are not as influential in the size of the seaweed population, providing little effect on that population. This is because sea otters control the population of sea urchins through predation. Thus, if more sea urchins are consumed by sea otters, the sea urchin population becomes small and consequently the consumption of algae (by sea urchins) is small.

On the right side of the figure, killer whales are great predators of sea otters and establish a strong predatorism, being very influential in the population of sea otters. This predatorism causes the otter population to decrease and stay in controlled and limited sizes. In this case, with few sea otters in the environment, their predatorism in relation to sea urchins is less, allowing the sea urchin population to grow and to consume more seaweed, providing a strong impact on the seaweed population.

8 0

3 years ago

Which could be a reason viruses are considered nonliving things?

aleksandrvk [35]

One reason could be that they do not have most of the seven characteristics of life (reproduction, homeostasis, heredity, response to the environment, growth, cellular organization, and metabolism.)

8 0

4 years ago