The identity of every person who has taken custody of the evidence is the correct answer I think
Answer:
It helps improve their credit history and it helps them be able to get one in the future without the hastle.
Explanation:
The reason why it would help their credit history is becasue if they dont intend on using it then they wont be spending money that they dont have so then they wont have to pay it off every month. And getting a creditcard in the first place is pretty difficult becasue they always look at your credit score or history and most of the time when somone applies for a crditcard they dont have a creditscore or history.
Answer:
The coroner may order a post-mortem examination to determine the cause, identification of the remains, document injuries, and to assist in determining the manner of death. A coroner usually orders a forensic autopsy if foul play is suspected.
Explanation:
The 24- 48 window is a good time for everything to still be the same it was after the incident therefore no more further injuries could happen and everything is still "fresh".
There are a lot of human rights. The right that protects your purchase is right to redress.
<h3>Who is entitled to have a redress?
</h3>
- An individual can be entitled to redress when they are of 18 years or cannot manage his or her own affairs.
In terms of business, Consumers also have the right to be compensated when they have cases such as misrepresentation, shoddy goods and unsatisfactory services. This helps to remove doubt and makes sure there is credibility of the producers and the goods being produced are of quality.
Learn more about right to redress from
brainly.com/question/3884093
Answer:
"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."
Explanation:
