Answer:
A)not negate the logical basis for trade in the Ricardian model.
Explanation:
Trade can be regarded as basic economic concept which involves the buying as well as selling of goods and services, having a compensation that is been paid by a buyer to a seller.
The Ricardian model can be regarded as model that incorporates the standard assumptions of a perfect competition. This model in it's simplest form give assumption of two countries that are producing two goods, but uses one factor of production, the goods here are usually assumed to be identical, or to be homogeneous, within as well as across countries. It should be noted that when there is higher wage, there will be greater number of workers that are willing to work and vice versa, which defined the relationship between wages and productivity. productivity gives the
measurement of how efficiently labor
is been utilized when producing goods and services.
It should be noted that If labor productivities were exactly proportional to wage levels internationally, this would not negate the logical basis for trade in the Ricardian model.
Answer:
The statement is false
Explanation:
WBS stands for Work Breakdown Structure is the outcome or output that is oriented analysis of the work, comprise in the project and describe the aggregate scope of the project.
It provides the basis for managing as well as planning the schedule of the project and the budget.
And organizing the second level of WBS, states the objectivities of the project, therefore, it does not facilitates the rolling wave planning through the design components.
Answer:
quantity demanded equals quantity supplied
Explanation:
The market equilibrium is the price at which the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied cross each other. The intersection could be made by supply and demand curves.
Therefore, there is a direct relationship between the price and the quantity supplied, while the price and quantity demanded have an inverse relationship.
When the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are intersect at the price so we called market equilibrium
Explanation:
The computation of the future value is shown below:
As we know that
Future value = Present value × (1 + interest rate)^number of years
In the first case,
Future value = $2,050 × (1 + 0.12)^12
= $2,050 × 3.895975993
= $7,986.75
In the second case,
Future value = $8,352 × (1 + 0.10)^6
= $8,352 × 1.771561
= $14,796.08
In the third case,
Future value = $72,355× (1 + 0.11)^13
= $72,355 × 3.883280163
= $280,974.74
In the fourth case,
Future value = $179,796 × (1 + 0.07)^7
= $179,796 × 1.605781476
= $288,713.09
Answer:
i believe the answer is TRUE
Explanation:
