Answer:
hmm ..
just transfer the X at the right side and others on left side
Step-by-step explanation:
so you get
w-z = yx
so later
(w-z)/y = x
Answer:
5/12
Step-by-step explanation:
First you add 1/4+2/3.
You need to change the denominator so that they are equal to each other
If you multiply the 1/4 by 3/3 you will get 3/12 which is equal to 1/4
Then you need to do the same to 2/3. This time you need to multiply it by 4/4 to get the same denominator which will be 2/3*4/4=8/12
Then you add 3/12+8/12=11/12. You don't need to add the denominator.
After this you will need to subtract 11/12 and 1/2. This time you need to only change the denominator for 1/2.
You multiply the denominator and numerator by 6/6 to 1/2 and you will get 6/12 then you are going to subtract 11/12-6/12 and you will get 5/12
I'm not sure I understand the question. Is this worded correctly?
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.
IT is True.
<span>¾ is considered a real number</span>