U.S.<span> victory in the war produced a </span>peace treaty<span> that compelled the </span>Spanish<span> to relinquish claims on Cuba, and to cede sovereignty over Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the </span>United States<span>. Hope this helped! :)</span>
Answer:
FDR had been stirring up conflicts in Europe since around 1935 in the hopes of getting the United States involved in a war to create jobs after his New Deal programs failed.
The war in Europe didn't involve United States' interests, and so Congress wouldn't give FDR the green light.
To force their hand, he arranged for oil embargoes around the Pacific and then lured Japan to America with promises of much-needed oil.
First, however, they were required to purchases licenses to buy the oil and then Roosevelt reneged on selling them at the last minute. This infuriated the Japanese, provoking them into attacking Pearl Harbor.
In doing this, FDR's provocation of Japan to attack the US was an act of treason.
Explanation:
Answer:
reactive
Explanation:
Societies who made reactive change only make it in order to adapt Rather than do it for a certain cause or principles.
In the example above, BP's already know that their method of over exploitation could possess a risk for oil spilling, and yet they did not make the necessary effort to prevent it.
After the explosion occurred and the spilled oil damaged the nearby environment, BP decided to make a change by containing surface oil and Utilizing chemical oil dispersal to separate the oil that is spilled underwater.
BP made the change in reaction after the accident occured, not before. Which is why we consider this as a reactive change.
Answer:
The natural barrier
Explanation:
If this is not a choice i did it so i could ace my math test to get sdome free answers. Just copying the guy above me.
Answer: Option (B). The judiciary and legal system should be independent.
Explanation: principles of the rule of law entails:- principles of supremacy of the law, avoidance of arbitrariness, equality before the law, accountability to the law, legal certainty, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, and procedural and legal transparency. However, for this principle to function effectively and properly, the judiciary and legal system should be independent.
The laws are clear, and stable, they are also applied evenly and they protect fundamental human rights, including the security of persons, human rights, contract, and property.
