Answer:
Table -
x=-1 y= 6
x=0 y= 1
x=1 y= -4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answers are found by plugging in any 3 values of x
The transformation of <span>f(x)=15tanx would be achieved by dilating y</span>=tanx graph 15 times. This transformation will cause y'=15 y. This will increase the value of dilation become 15 times of the original
The transformation of g(x)=15tanx would be achieved by shifting y=tanx graph 15 right. This transformation will cause x'=x+15. This will change the value from tan x into tan(x+15)
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B.
<span>Segment TX is the segment that would best represent the altitude of the parallelogram.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
y = -5x + 39
Step-by-step explanation:
Plug either ordered pair into the Point-Slope Formula FIRST, <em>y</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>y</em><em>₁</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em>(</em><em>x</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>x</em><em>₁</em><em>)</em><em>,</em><em> </em>then convert to Slope-Intercept Form by moving whichever term is nearest to <em>y</em><em>,</em><em> </em>over to the right side of the equivalence symbol to get the above answer.
Answer:
It mean that the observed progeny is similar than the expected progeny. There is no a relationship between the categorical variables.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Chi-squared test is used to test the relationship between categorical variables. A categorical variable is a non-numerical variable. The null hypothesis of the Chi-squared test is that categorical variables are independent; it means that the frequencies are not dependent on the variable. It is important to know that the Chi-squared test does not measure causality, it only measures the relationship. To reject the null hypothesis, you usually need a probability lower than 0.05, but in this case, the probability was way higher than 0.05, it was between 0.5 and 0.9.
