You would plug in the 6 and have y=6+5 and your y would equal 11.
Third choice. hope i gelped
Answer:
AAS postulate can be used to prove that these two triangles are congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the cases of congruence
- SSS ⇒ 3 sides in the 1st Δ ≅ 3 sides in the 2nd Δ
- SAS ⇒ 2 sides and including angle in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 sides and including angle in the 2nd Δ
- ASA ⇒ 2 angles and the side whose joining them in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 angles and the side whose joining them in the 2nd Δ
- AAS ⇒ 2 angles and one side in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 angles and one side in the 2nd Δ
- HL ⇒ hypotenuse and leg of the 1st right Δ ≅ hypotenuse and leg of the 2nd right Δ
In the given figure
∵ There is a pair of vertically opposite angles
∵ The vertically opposite angles are congruent ⇒ (1)
∵ There are two angles have the same mark
∴ These marked angles are congruent ⇒ (2)
∵ There are two sides have the same mark
∴ These two marked sides are congruent ⇒ (3)
→ From (1), (2), and (3)
∴ The two triangles have 2 angles and 1 side congruent
→ By using case 4 above
∴ The two triangles are congruent by the AAS postulate of congruency.
AAS postulate can be used to prove that these two triangles are congruent
To solve, you make a systems of equation:
x+(x+3)=25, the x representing the number of pigs. Since there is no multiplication and following the order of operations, you add the x’s to get 2x+3=25. Then, you subtract 3 from both sides to get 2x=22, then divide by 2 on both sides to isolate the variable. Therefore, x=11 and Mary is taking care of 11 pigs.
<span>58%
The sum of all the probabilities has to be 100%. In tennis, because there's no time limit, a match will always result in a win or a loss. Since Garry has won 42% of his games, that means that he's lost 100% - 42% = 58% of his games. And if you assume his win/loss ratio is reflective of his future games as well as his past games, then he as a 58% chances of loosing his next match.</span>
