Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
Answer:
Option A The impact of a change in the local currency on inflow and outflow variables can sometimes be indirect and therefore different from what is expected.
Explanation:
The reason is that the changes in the currency exchange rate in which the company receives the payment and is also not a home currency, such risk exposure is known as economic exposure. So the only option that correct here is option A.
Option B is incorrect because depreciation is non cash item and it is not exposed to currency fluctuations.
Option C and D are also incorrect because domestic firms don't face any economic exposure.
Answer:
$312.5 million
Explanation:
Given that,
Besnier Company's sales last year = $250 million
Fixed assets last year = $75 million
Previous operating capacity of fixed assets = 80%
Sales at full capacity:
= Previous sales ÷ Previous Capacity
= $250 million ÷ 80%
= $312.5 million
Therefore, if the company had operated at full capacity then the sales could have been $312.5 million.
