I’m not entirely sure buh i think it’s town meetings
Answer:
Truly florishing given the kind of being that we are
Explanation: happiness is usually a word we usually don't read meaning to most times. Aristotle describe happiness as florishing like the eudaemonist theories. Aristotle was the one who lead the notion or view on science of happiness. He believes happiness is a complete virtue and the purpose of life itself and our goal
Answer:d)Radical behaviorism
Explanation:Radical behaviorism is the behavior that displays the analysis of the behavior. This behavior arises due to the naturally happening of the events and situation.
This type of the already learnt behavior due to environment stimuli is derived from the fundamental of the nature that consist of the modification in the behavior, giving importance to environment and surroundings.Other option given in question don't provide the already learned response from the surrounding.Thus, the correct option is option(d).
- How can photos be used as alternate forms of argument?
It can be used as a visual proof to convince others about your point.
Argument often derived from personal conviction. This personal conviction often really hard to get rid off even if the oppositions provides a clear and logical argument to debunk it.
Visual proof often harder to deny since it can depict a certain situation in a more convincing way rather than personal recollection . Often times, this can be a lot stronger compared to trying to convince others simply by using words.
- Can a photo convince you to take a specific action or to think a certain way?
Absolutely.
For example, Let's say that you hear 2 people arguing in the court. Person A accused person B for killing person C at December 12th. Person B denied the accusation.
At this point, you probably not really sure who's in the right.
But, let's say that<u> person B showed a photo that proved he is actually in another city</u> on December 12th and it is impossible for him to be at the crime scene on the time of person C attack.
That photo could easily win the argument in person B's favor and convince others who witness it that he is telling the truth.
I encountered this question before but it had choices. The missing choices of this question are:
A- immigration
<span>B-Natural selection </span>
<span>C- Random mutations </span>
<span>D- Geographic isolation
My answer would be C - RANDOM MUTATIONS.
A. Immigration is not applicable because it states There has been no migration in or out of the population in the last 200 years.
B. Natural selection is not applicable because of it states that the recessive allele frequency has been 0%.
D. Geographic isolation is not applicable because it is not a factor in the increase in the recessive allele frequency.
</span>
