All categories

3 years ago

!!30 POINTS!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

lana66690 [7]3 years ago

8 0

For this case we have the following functions:
f (x) = 3x + 4
g (x) = 2 ^ x - 1
The intersection with the y axis of the original functions is:
f (0) = 3 (0) + 4 = 0 + 4 = 4
g (0) = 2 ^ 0 - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0
The transformations that must be applied so that they have the same intersection with the y axis are:
f (x) - 3
g (x) + 1
Answer:
f (x) - 3
g (x) + 1
option 1

You might be interested in

I don’t understand how to identify quadratic transformations. Can I have so help please?

Levart [38]

Answer:

The parent function for a quadratic is f(x) = x^2. If there is something other than this, that is how you know it is a quadratic transformation.

8 0

2 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!

grin007 [14]

Answer:

i think the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

i think it would be the smartest thing to pick

7 0

3 years ago

The figure to the right has its Congruent segments marked. AB=__ meters

Ber [7]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

20 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

The single hash mark on AB matches the single hash mark on AC, so AB = AC. AC is marked as 20 meters, so AB is 20 meters.

7 0

3 years ago

In some country the budget for defense exceeded the budget for education by $660.4 billion. If x represents the budget for edu

photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

<u>The budget for defense can be represented as x + 660.4</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Let's review the information provided to us to answer the question correctly:

Budget for education is $ 660.4 billion less than budget for defense in some country

x = represents the budget for education, in billion of dollars

2. How can the budget for defense be represented?

x = represents the budget for education, in billion of dollars

x + 660.4 = represents the budget for defense, in billion of dollars also

<u>The correct answer is that the budget for defense can be represented as x + 660.4</u>

5 0

3 years ago

Drag each real-world situation to the correct column to show whether it can be modeled by combining additive inverses to get 0.

Flauer [41]

Answer:

. An investment account earns 2.8% simple interest.

Since investment amount increases every year linearly, therefore, the modeled situation represents a LINEAR FUNCTION.

B). The price of a stock varies by 2.8% each week.

Since price of the stock may increase or decrease every week, therefore, this situation can't be modeled by any function.

Therefore, the answer is NEITHER.

C). An investment account earns 2.8% compound interest, compounded monthly.

Formula to get the value of the final amount in the account is,

Final value = Initial value ×

Here 't' = Duration of investment

It's an EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago