Answer:
x = 36
Step-by-step explanation:
Given;
(8/9)x = 32
Solving for x
Multiply through by 9
(8/9)×9 ×x = 32×9
8x = 32×9
Divide through by 8
8x/8 = 32×9/8
x = 36
Answer: 12 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
Two rates for hoses A and B. FP is the Fish Pond.
A = 20 min/FP or (1/20)FP/min
B = 30 min/FP or (1/30)FP/min
The time in minutes, X, to fill one FP:
1FP = X*((1/20)FP/min) + X*((1/30)FP/min)
1FP = X*(1/20+1/30)FP/min
1FP = X*(2.5/30)FP/min
X = 12 minutes
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28e17/28e171be9001ee5f447a9a80b3cd606cb244f8bf" alt="H_{0} = 95"
The alternate hypotesis is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fb7d/3fb7d36a24faecf42526615127756a61125d6ad0" alt="H_{1} \neq 95"
The test statistic is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02826/0282648cb3acf23fde9c4dc6137de21a33c73ec3" alt="z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}"
In which X is the sample mean,
is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bcb/77bcbf5b7b91790053542225022b502787843bce" alt="n = 260, X = 94, \sigma = 6"
The test-statistic is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02826/0282648cb3acf23fde9c4dc6137de21a33c73ec3" alt="z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02311/023113d2abed77dce984ee4718833aab6b11bfb3" alt="z = \frac{94 - 95}{\frac{6}{\sqrt{260}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/849ef/849ef02adf0cf160bce3c51eae1edc4c02b15f4e" alt="z = -2.69"
The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Answer:
The median of the distribution is (first option);
1
Step-by-step explanation:
The values on the given table are presented as follows;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c483/0c483edc058b88e925ad8d74a96ef1fd9f17ebad" alt="\begin{array}{cccccc}Value \ of \ Spin&0&1&2&5&10\\Probability&0.4&0.2&0.2&0.1&0.1\end{array}"
To find the median, we calculate the cumulative probabilities to find the value of the spin art which the cumulative probability is 0.5 as follows;
Cumulative probability, starting from the left, is therefore;
Probability for spin of 0, 0.4 + Probability for spin of 1, 0.2 = 0.6
Therefore, given that the probability of 0.5 occurs within the Value of Spin 1, the median of the probability distribution is 1