Answer:
It is better to use direct quotation rather than summarizing or paraphrasing when you want to share the author's original words.
Explanation:
In writing, it is sometimes necessary to share an authors original words in order to buttress a point or validate an argument. In such cases where it is necessary to use exactly the same diction as the author in order to communicate a point clearly, it is apt to use a direct quotation rather than attempting to summarize or paraphrase the original words of the author.
Hence direct quotation is used to share an author's original words.
<span>For an atom to have no charge, that is neutral, the number of electrons should be the same to the number of electrons. If the number of electron is more than the number of proton, the atom is negatively charged. Also, when the number of proton is more than the number of electron, the atom is positively charged. The answer to this item is letter C. </span>
Answer:
6.24 x 10-3 M
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, for the given dissociation, we have the following equilibrium expression in terms of the law of mass action:
![Ka=\frac{[H_3O^+][BrO^-]}{[HBrO]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ka%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH_3O%5E%2B%5D%5BBrO%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHBrO%5D%7D)
Of course, water is excluded as it is liquid and the concentration of aqueous species should be considered only. In such a way, in terms of the change 
, we rewrite the expression considering an ICE table and the initial concentration of HBrO that is 0.749 M:
Thus, we obtain a quadratic equation whose solution is:
Clearly, the solution is 0.00624 M as no negative concentrations are allowed, so the concentration of BrO⁻ is 6.24 x 10-3 M.
Best regards.
