Answer:
- There is no significant evidence that p1 is different than p2 at 0.01 significance level.
- 99% confidence interval for p1-p2 is -0.171 ±0.237 that is (−0.408, 0.066)
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p1 be the proportion of the common attribute in population1
And p2 be the proportion of the same common attribute in population2
: p1-p2=0
: p1-p2≠0
Test statistic can be found using the equation:
where
- p1 is the sample proportion of the common attribute in population1 (
)
- p2 is the sample proportion of the common attribute in population2 (
)
- p is the pool proportion of p1 and p2 (
)
- n1 is the sample size of the people from population1 (30)
- n2 is the sample size of the people from population2 (1900)
Then
≈ 2.03
p-value of the test statistic is 0.042>0.01, therefore we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no significant evidence that p1 is different than p2.
99% confidence interval estimate for p1-p2 can be calculated using the equation
p1-p2±
where
- z is the z-statistic for the 99% confidence (2.58)
Thus 99% confidence interval is
0.533-0.704±
≈ -0.171 ±0.237 that is (−0.408, 0.066)
Answer:
A. 8/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Type each fraction into a calculator. (or use long division if you aren't allowed a calculator. I can't explain long division in a brainly comment there isn't enough flexibility)
8/3=2.666666
6/4=1.5
12/5=2.4
14/8=1.75
Answer:
So the answer for this case would be n=22547 rounded up to the nearest integer
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's define some notation
represent the sample mean
population mean (variable of interest)
represent the population standard deviation
n represent the sample size
represent the margin of error desire
The margin of error is given by this formula:
(a)
And on this case we have that ME =+1 and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:
(b)
The critical value for 99% of confidence interval now can be founded using the normal distribution. The significance would be
and the critical value
, replacing into formula (b) we got:
So the answer for this case would be n=22547 rounded up to the nearest integer
Answer:
$16
Step-by-step explanation:
48÷3= $16 per pair of shoe
I think this is how you solve this and the answer <span><span><span>0.1+30</span>+8</span>−12</span>+<span>14</span><span>=<span>26.35
</span></span>