Answer: 4-allylanisole
Explanation: The doublets behind the 7 ppm belongs to the
para-substituted benzene ring. The three single-proton multi-plets around 5−6 ppm predicts that there has to be a single subsituted alkene group
A single plus a doublet around 3-4 ppm belongs to CH3 and CH2 Groups as they could be attached to the subsituted alkene group.
Moreover the interpretation of the NMR that there is no peak with a higher intensity for >180 ppm represents an absence of Carbonyl group.
The Predicted Number is attached from a chemical database along with their peaks information
Answer: A) Inconclusive; you would not know which of the two variables caused the change.
Explanation:
When you set up an experiment, you must make sure that you control the variables such that only one independent variable changes at a time, while all the remainder conditions (the other independent variables) are controlled (fixed).
By observing (measuring) the dependent variable, while only one independent variable changes you can understandhow such independent variable explains (determines) the dependent variable, leading to a conclusion.
Conversely, if two or more independent variables change at a time, then there is no way that you can tell how the output (dependent variable) is related with one or other of the changes of the indipendent variables. You wolud not be able to discriminate (distinguish) the effect of one or other variable, making the experiment inconclusive
I really hope this answer helps you out! It makes my day helping people like you and giving back to the community that has helped me through school! If you could do me a favor, if this helped you and this is the very best answer and you understand that all of my answers are legit and top notch. Please mark as brainliest! Thanks and have a awesome day!
This question is testing to see how well you understand the "half-life" of radioactive elements, and how well you can manipulate and dance around them. This is not an easy question.
The idea is that the "half-life" is a certain amount of time. It's the time it takes for 'half' of the atoms in any sample of that particular unstable element to 'decay' ... their nuclei die, fall apart, and turn into nuclei of other elements.
Look over the table. There are 4,500 atoms of this radioactive substance when the time is 12,000 seconds, and there are 2,250 atoms of it left when the time is ' y ' seconds. Gosh ... 2,250 is exactly half of 4,500 ! So the length of time from 12,000 seconds until ' y ' is the half life of this substance ! But how can we find the length of the half-life ? ? ?
Maybe we can figure it out from other information in the table !
Here's what I found:
Do you see the time when there were 3,600 atoms of it ?
That's 20,000 seconds.
... After one half-life, there were 1,800 atoms left.
... After another half-life, there were 900 atoms left.
... After another half-life, there were 450 atoms left.
==> 450 is in the table ! That's at 95,000 seconds.
So the length of time from 20,000 seconds until 95,000 seconds
is three half-lifes.
The length of time is (95,000 - 20,000) = 75,000 sec
3 half lifes = 75,000 sec
Divide each side by 3 : 1 half life = 25,000 seconds
There it is ! THAT's the number we need. We can answer the question now.
==> 2,250 atoms is half of 4,500 atoms.
==> ' y ' is one half-life later than 12,000 seconds
==> ' y ' = 12,000 + 25,000
y = 37,000 seconds .
Check:
Look how nicely 37,000sec fits in between 20,000 and 60,000 in the table.
As I said earlier, this is not the simplest half-life problem I've seen.
You really have to know what you're doing on this one. You can't
bluff through it.
An experiment that would show that intramolecular forces are stronger than intermolecular forces will be heating a block of ice in a sealed container then allowing it to change to steam.
Intramolecular forces are the forces of attraction that hold atoms together within a molecule. Intramolecular forces require a high amount of energy to splits atoms or molecules in a chemical bonding.
Intermolecular forces are weaker forces of attraction that occur between molecules. They require lesser energy to splits molecules compared to intramolecular forces.
An experiment that would show that intramolecular forces are stronger than intermolecular forces will be heating a block of ice in a sealed container then allowing it to change to steam.
In the process, the energy required to change the state from ice to steam water is more than intermolecular forces.
Thus, we can conclude that this experiment shows that the intramolecular forces are stronger than the intermolecular forces.
Learn more about Intramolecular forces here:
brainly.com/question/13588164